|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | [Help-smalltalk] MIT strikes back (was Re: [smalltalk-research] Re: [Esug-list] Google Summer Of Code 2010 news!!!) |
Date: | Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:16:47 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.1 |
On 03/10/2010 05:06 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
What the starting point is will depend on to what extent Cog has been open sourced (Teleplace may choose to open source single-threaded Cog initially, keeping back the threaded FFI for a while, it may not open source Cog at all; we'll see :) ).May be I the only one to notice the:) which I have problem to understand since for me it announces that COG may not be open-source.
Isn't this what you wanted to allow companies to do, when you chose the MIT license? I don't understand, why should you care? I see some irony... Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |