help-smalltalk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] short list of possible smalltalk extensions


From: Stefan Schmiedl
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] short list of possible smalltalk extensions
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 01:11:05 +0100

On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:18:28 +0100
Gwenaël Casaccio <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> What about that:
> 
>  x foo: 1 :> bar: 2 :> baz: 3 :> zork: 4 instead of (((x foo: 1) bar:
> 2) baz: 3) zork: 4


oooohhh... that would eliminate my favorite reason for hitting
the up arrow when writing code.

But it is a good step on the slippery slope towards complex
operator precedence rules.

s.

> 
> (from vasily bikov blog: http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/08/30/message-chains/)
> 
> Gwen



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]