help-smalltalk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Help-smalltalk] Using COMMON/UNCOMMON


From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther
Subject: [Help-smalltalk] Using COMMON/UNCOMMON
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:28:38 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7

Hi Paolo,
on the hype of the micro benchmarking I started to look at GST (mostly to
understand the VM and not so much in making it faster). It appears to me that
when defining COMMON/UNCOMMON to nothing we get a speedup on the
tinyBenchmark. So this means that either some of the COMMON/UNCOMMOM are
placed incorrectly, or that the tinyBenchmark is not what we are optimizing
for and that the COMMON/UNCOMMON are better for some workloads.

Would you be interested in knowing from where this difference is coming? I
could build with gprof and then use lcov and their branch visualization.


holger


Before:
198180762 bytecodes/sec; 6070565 sends/sec

After:
220286113 bytecodes/sec; 6342298 sends/sec

PS: stable-3.2 as of yesterday, on a Fedora14/i686 system.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]