[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:37:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 |
Il 20/08/2012 21:56, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto:
> After these changes, the Smalltalk build system still works with
> mainline Automake (and only with it), but will be much easier to
> modify to convert it to Automake-NG.
Can you send a "patch 6" with the remaining changes?
I'm a bit scared of this:
* libgst/Makefile.am ($(srcdir)/match.stamp): No need to specify
the '$(srcdir)/' explicitly, since the Smalltalk build system is
assuming GNU make anyway (it was once necessary to avoid a bug
with FreeBSD VPATH handling); so rename this target simply ...
(match.stamp): ... like this. Also, depend on 'genbc$(EXEEXT)',
rather than calling '$(MAKE)' recursively in the recipe to build
it. Not only is this more efficient, it also avoid possible
hanging of "make all" in the 'libgist' subdir when Automake-NG
is used to bootstrap the Smalltalk build system.
Why should it hang "make all"? Isn't it a bug in Automake-NG?
Paolo
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] My "forks" of GNU projects to test Automake-NG, (continued)
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] My "forks" of GNU projects to test Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/20
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] My "forks" of GNU projects to test Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 2/5] build: prefer pattern rules over suffix rules, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 1/5] build: use $(AM_CPPFLAGS), not $(INCLUDES), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 3/5] build: don't use files with non-standard extensions in _SOURCES, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 4/5] svnprintf: modernize and improve its build system, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 4/5] svnprintf: modernize and improve its build system, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 4/5] svnprintf: modernize and improve its build system, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 5/5] build: reorganize some stamp files' handling, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- [Help-smalltalk] [BUG] Possible hang of make with tricky use of BUILT_SOURCES (was: Re: [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG (was: Re: [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- [Help-smalltalk] Automake vs. Automake-NG (was: Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21