[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:09:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 |
Il 21/08/2012 11:02, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto:
> First of all, there still a stray use of '$(INCLUDES)' that I missed to
> convert in my earlier patches. The patch below takes care of that.
>
> Sorry for the noise,
> Stefano
>
> -----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----
>
> From b33b57b68023c5cc203e154360c1014792aae2c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: <address@hidden>
> From: Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:00:47 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] build: once more, use $(AM_CPPFLAGS), not $(INCLUDES)
>
> The latter is a long-deprecated and obsolescent alias for the former.
>
> * packages/gtk/Makefile.am (INCLUDES): Rename ...
> (AM_CPPFLAGS): ... like this
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden>
I had already noticed it when applying the patches (because I first
backported them to the 3.2 branch, and then merged stable-3.2 into
master). I'll push shortly.
No problem, thanks for the fixes.
Paolo
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 2/5] build: prefer pattern rules over suffix rules, (continued)
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 2/5] build: prefer pattern rules over suffix rules, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 1/5] build: use $(AM_CPPFLAGS), not $(INCLUDES), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 3/5] build: don't use files with non-standard extensions in _SOURCES, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 4/5] svnprintf: modernize and improve its build system, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 4/5] svnprintf: modernize and improve its build system, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 4/5] svnprintf: modernize and improve its build system, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 5/5] build: reorganize some stamp files' handling, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- [Help-smalltalk] [BUG] Possible hang of make with tricky use of BUILT_SOURCES (was: Re: [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG (was: Re: [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- [Help-smalltalk] Automake vs. Automake-NG (was: Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21