[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 4/5] svnprintf: modernize and improve its bu
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 4/5] svnprintf: modernize and improve its build system |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:56:32 +0200 |
On 08/21/2012 05:52 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 20/08/2012 21:56, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto:
>> * snvprintf/Makefile.am (DIST_SUBDIRS): Don't explicitly define
>> to $(SUBDIRS), that's the default anyway.
>> (MAINTAINERCLEANFILES): Don't clean the various Autotools-generated
>> files, that goes against the GNU coding standards, which explicitly
>> say "... more generally, 'make maintainer-clean' should not delete
>> anything that needs to exist in order to run 'configure' and then
>> begin to build the program".
>> (aclocaldir): Remove definition; it's not used anyway, since the
>> file 'snprintfv.m4' is not installed.
>> (dist_noinst_DATA): Drop as useless, since the only file listed
>> in there ('snprintfv.m4') is automatically distributed, being
>> 'm4_included'd in the generated aclocal.m4.
>> (nodist_noinst_HEADERS): Drop as useless, since the only file
>> listed in there ('config.h') is automatically generated anyway
>> by ./configure.
>> Also remove some redundant comments and blank lines.
>> * snvprintf/snvprintf/Makefile.am (AWK): Remove, it's never used.
>> (MAINTAINERCLEANFILES): Don't clean the Automake-generated
>> Makefile.in files, that goes against the GNU coding standards.
>
> What part of this is a cleanup, and what part is required?
>
Should all be a cleanup (albeit INCLUDES was being AC_SUBST'd, it
was always empty AFAICS, so caused no real incompatibility; just
dead code). Nothing in this change *should* be actually required
for the Automake-NG conversion.
Regards,
Stefano
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] My "forks" of GNU projects to test Automake-NG, (continued)
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] My "forks" of GNU projects to test Automake-NG, Holger Hans Peter Freyther, 2012/08/19
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] My "forks" of GNU projects to test Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/19
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] My "forks" of GNU projects to test Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/20
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] My "forks" of GNU projects to test Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 2/5] build: prefer pattern rules over suffix rules, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 1/5] build: use $(AM_CPPFLAGS), not $(INCLUDES), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 3/5] build: don't use files with non-standard extensions in _SOURCES, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 4/5] svnprintf: modernize and improve its build system, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 4/5] svnprintf: modernize and improve its build system, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 4/5] svnprintf: modernize and improve its build system,
Stefano Lattarini <=
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 5/5] build: reorganize some stamp files' handling, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/20
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- [Help-smalltalk] [BUG] Possible hang of make with tricky use of BUILT_SOURCES (was: Re: [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG (was: Re: [PATCH 0/5] build: refactoring and preparations for Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
- [Help-smalltalk] Automake vs. Automake-NG (was: Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21