[Help-smalltalk] Sending 'Recompiling' messages to stderr instead of stdout?

[Rick Flower]

So, I've got a few scripts that use the XML package.. When I bring that
package in I get the messages below emitted to stdout along with the 
output
of my script.

In light of the fact that this script will be used in an environment
where someone using the script won't know what these messages mean,
I was thinking it'd be nice to send those to stderr instead of stdout.
That way I can, as the script writer, choose whether or not stderr
output is seen or not.. Are there any pitfalls to doing something like
this?

Recompiling classes...
Recompiling class: XML.Attribute
Recompiling selector: #key
Recompiling selector: #value
Recompiling selector: #value:
Recompiling selector: #printOn:
Recompiling selector: #isLike:
Recompiling selector: #simpleDescription
Recompiling selector: #isAttribute
Recompiling selector: #printCanonicalOn:
Recompiling selector: #expandedName
Recompiling selector: #tag:
Recompiling selector: #name:value:
Recompiling selector: #characterData
Recompiling selector: #tag
Recompiling class: XML.Attribute class
Recompiling selector: #name:value: