help-smalltalk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] stinst: Make RBScanner>>#scanNumber work fo


From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] stinst: Make RBScanner>>#scanNumber work for the ConcatenatedStream
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:12:27 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 08:07:52PM +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:

> The species of the ConcatenatedStream is Array so we will need to
> convert the result of reading from the stream with >>#next: to a
> String first before we can trim the separators.

Hi,

the testcase is requiring the ConcatenatedStream to be fixed. I have
created a bug report earlier today with the command to reproduce the
issue. The other question is if the ConcatenatedStream should maybe
re-implement >>#species and return the species if all streams have the
species?

The previous stinst patch was against stable-3.2, this one is for master
and only master due the >>#scanNumber patch only being in master.

holger



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]