help-smalltalk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] stinst: Make RBScanner>>#scanNumber work fo


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH] stinst: Make RBScanner>>#scanNumber work for the ConcatenatedStream
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:10:47 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2

Il 11/02/2013 00:14, Holger Hans Peter Freyther ha scritto:
>> > Should the species came from the current stream instead?
> I'm not sure about the best practises. Would it ever make sense
> to mix the species? For the gst-convert case.. everything will
> be a FileStream. I wonder if we should just return the species
> of the first stream? I am still happy to have found an issue
> in the >>#next: implementation of the concatenated stream.

I think returning the species of the current stream is okay.  For
example #copyFrom:to: only works within one stream.

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]