help-smalltalk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] Fun/Crashes with newer GCC on Debian


From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Fun/Crashes with newer GCC on Debian
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:11:04 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 06:45:05PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 11/10/2013 08:08, Holger Hans Peter Freyther ha scritto:
> > C-code:
> > 
> > I get asan reports in _gst_grey_oop_range *page = *page;. With
> > generations off and NO_INCREMENTAL_GC set. Can't this be a NO-OP?
> 
> This is done to generate a segfault, but only if the page is still
> unwritable.  It is definitely a false positive.

Okay, but with NO_SIGSEGV_HANDLING defined we could avoid this. The
pages are readable/writable anyway so will not generate a segfault
while read/written?

diff --git a/libgst/oop.c b/libgst/oop.c
index c8af8c6..71e837a 100644
--- a/libgst/oop.c
+++ b/libgst/oop.c
@@ -1630,6 +1630,7 @@ tenure_one_object ()
 void
 _gst_grey_oop_range (PTR from, size_t size)
 {
+#ifndef NO_SIGSEGV_HANDLING
   volatile char *last, *page;
 
   for (last = ((char *)from) + size,
@@ -1637,6 +1638,7 @@ _gst_grey_oop_range (PTR from, size_t size)
        page < last;
        page += getpagesize())
     *page = *page;
+#endif
 }


holger



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]