libmicrohttpd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libmicrohttpd] Clarification on receiving on one thread, replying o


From: José Bollo
Subject: Re: [libmicrohttpd] Clarification on receiving on one thread, replying on another
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:24:14 +0200

This topic is very interesting.

Is it the same issue when an external select/poll is used?

Best regards
José Bollo


Le mardi 25 octobre 2016 à 11:45 -0400, Tom Cornell a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:11:12PM +0200, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> > 
> > On 10/25/2016 03:59 PM, Tom Cornell wrote:
> > > 
> > > I will rework the code along the lines you suggest. Thanks for
> > > the 
> > > quick reply!
> > 
> > Ok, if it still doesn't work, I suggest you come back with a
> > minimal
> > example for us to look at -- easier to discuss with concrete code.
> 
> It is working fine now. Thanks again!
> 
> Basically, to sum up what I now think I understand,
> you can be in any of 4 or 5 states when the access handler 
> callback is called:
> 
> 1. New connection (*con_cls is null)
> 2. Receiving data (*con_cls is not null, *upload_data_size > 0)
> 3. Received all data (*con_cls is not null, *upload_data_size is 0)
> Aaaaand the ones I was missing:
> 4. Waiting for response (*con_cls is not null, *upload_data_size is
> still 0, 
>    and the part of *con_cls that holds your response is not filled
> in)
> 5. Response ready (*con_cls now holds a response)
> 
> If you suspend your connection before returning in state 3, 
> and resume it only once the response is in place,
> then you will never see state 4.
> 
> And of course you only see states 4 and 5 if you return from state 3
> without having queued a response already.
> 
> Is that more or less correct?
> 
> By the way, I've been using MHD for several years now and have been
> really happy with it. In this world of interacting networked
> services, 
> MHD has become one of the tools I use most. So thank you for all 
> the work you have put into it! It shows.
>  
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]