[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grand copyright replacement
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
Re: grand copyright replacement |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:47:12 +0000 (GMT) |
Hello,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:48:51 +0100, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >>> I'm going to run `scripts/build/grand-replace' to update all
> >>> copyright years. However, my test run shows that there are a bunch
> >>> of files that aren't covered, for example
> >>> `lily/part-combine-part-iterator.cc', which has the following
> >>> copyright notice:
> >>>
> >>> Copyright (C) 2015 Daniel Eble <address@hidden>
> >>>
> >>> Shall this be updated to
> >>>
> >>> Copyright (C) 2015-2019 Daniel Eble <address@hidden>
> >>>
> >>> ? Ditto for a bunch of other files...
> >>
> >> How come they aren't covered?
> >
> > `grand-replace.py' is very simplistic; it only updates last year's
> > copyright year to the current one.
> >
> > So is it OK to simply update the missing cases? Assuming we are
> > running `grand-replace' next year again this would be (in almost all
> > cases) a one-time job.
>
> Generally I'm a bit skeptical regarding those updates where people might
> have moved or even passed on, but that does not really hinge upon the
> matched or non-matched pattern, so I'd say go ahead.
Yes, it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission ;)
besides if someone 'complains' at least it was done in good faith.
James
Re: grand copyright replacement, Matthias Kilian, 2019/01/25