[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fingering not aligned in 2.17, ok in 2.16
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Fingering not aligned in 2.17, ok in 2.16 |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:23:01 +0100 |
On 22 mars 2013, at 18:32, SoundsFromSound <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hmm..I kind of like the new behavior too, it's easier on my eyes. I like how
> it staggers to flow with the score, but I can see why some would want strict
> lined-up fingerings as well.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> Ben
>
>
> Werner LEMBERG wrote
>>> See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically
>>> aligned. In 2.17.14, they aren't.
>>>
>>> \relative f'' {
>>> \set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
>>>
>> <cis-1 a-1 e-1>
>> 4
>>> }
>>
>> Do you consider this a bug? Actually, I like the new behaviour
>> better. What does the literature say?
>>
>>
>> Werner
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>
>> lilypond-user@
>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
Ugh, my LilyPond development is going to screech to a halt now (too much work)
but I have the solution sketched out in my head. If someone wants to tackle it
in C++ lemme know and I can give them the blueprint I have.
Cheers,
MS
- Fingering not aligned in 2.17, ok in 2.16, Nick Payne, 2013/03/22
- Re: Fingering not aligned in 2.17, ok in 2.16, address@hidden, 2013/03/22
- Re: Fingering not aligned in 2.17, ok in 2.16, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/03/22
- Re: Fingering not aligned in 2.17, ok in 2.16, Trevor Daniels, 2013/03/22
- Re: Fingering not aligned in 2.17, ok in 2.16, SoundsFromSound, 2013/03/22
- Re: Fingering not aligned in 2.17, ok in 2.16,
address@hidden <=
- Re: Fingering not aligned in 2.17, ok in 2.16, Nick Payne, 2013/03/22