[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lengthening broken ties
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: lengthening broken ties |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:59:08 +0100 (CET) |
>> In bar 2 you can see the effect of `minimum-length-after-break'.
>
> You mean bar 4--bar 2 is the default.
Of course. Typo.
>> Any chance to fix this? BTW, if you compare bar 2 with bar 6, you
>> see exactly the opposite effect w.r.t. the default tie length: with
>> a time signature the tie looks OK but without it is far too
>> short...
>
> If you change 'minimum-length-after-break to 'minimum-length, you'll
> get exactly the same result with the second half of each tied chord.
> This isn't a problem with the patch, as I changed nothing relating
> to the reference points from which the distances are reckoned.
Well, it wasn't my intention to insinuate a faulty patch :-) It's
certainly a problem with lilypond proper.
> From your analysis it appear that LilyPond is taking the entire
> NonMusicalPaperColumn into account rather than just the right
> extent. I'll have a look. (This could be major!)
Thanks in advance!
Werner
- Re: lengthening broken ties, (continued)
- Re: lengthening broken ties, David Nalesnik, 2015/02/04
- Re: lengthening broken ties, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/02/04
- Re: lengthening broken ties, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/02/04
- Re: lengthening broken ties, David Nalesnik, 2015/02/04
- Re: lengthening broken ties, David Nalesnik, 2015/02/04
- Re: lengthening broken ties, David Nalesnik, 2015/02/04
- Re: lengthening broken ties, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/02/04
- Re: lengthening broken ties, David Nalesnik, 2015/02/05
- Re: lengthening broken ties, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/02/15
- Re: lengthening broken ties, David Nalesnik, 2015/02/15
- Re: lengthening broken ties,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: lengthening broken ties, David Nalesnik, 2015/02/16
- Re: lengthening broken ties, David Nalesnik, 2015/02/16
Re: lengthening broken ties, Thomas Morley, 2015/02/03