[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:13:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Mark Knoop <address@hidden> writes:
> At 18:02 on 19 Aug 2016, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>>I recently typeset a concerto grosso from the baroque period, where
>>the solo and tutti parts are identical during long sections and then
>>they differ for some bars, every here and there. When entering the
>>parts, I used tags to handle the differences so producing the separate
>>parts works without problem. However, in the conductors score, I would
>>prefer to only use a single stave per instrument when the solo and
>>tutti play in unison, but individual staves when they differ. I
>>managed to handle this using remove-layer as long as there's only a
>>single instrument group that contains and occasional solo part, but if
>>for example both violin 1 and violin 2 have a solo plus a tutti, then
>>I didn't manage to get it to work correctly. The following example
>>shows my current attempt. As can be seen, the split between solo and
>>tutti parts happens both for violin 1 and 2 as soon as one of them is
>>split. For example, in the second score line, I would like to see Vi I
>>solo, Vi I tutti but only one stave with Vi II.
>
> Hi Mats,
>
> How does the attached look to you? Note I have moved the
> Keep_alive_together_engraver to the GrandStaff level so that the vln I
> and vln II groups can work independently. The problem now is making the
> system start braces cooperate.
I think we should likely have some context with only Keep_alive_engraver
in it and accepting all sorts of Staff contexts. That would likely be
more natural than juggling manually with Keep_alive_engraver.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases, (continued)
- Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases, Mark Knoop, 2016/08/16
- Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases, Mark Knoop, 2016/08/18
- Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases, Malte Meyn, 2016/08/18
- Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases, David Kastrup, 2016/08/18
- Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases, Malte Meyn, 2016/08/18
- Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/08/19
- Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases, David Wright, 2016/08/16
- Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/08/16
Re:Keep alive together - call for use cases, Mats Bengtsson, 2016/08/19
Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases, Abraham Lee, 2016/08/23
Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases, Mats Bengtsson, 2016/08/21
Re: Keep alive together - call for use cases, Mats Bengtsson, 2016/08/21