[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scheme set list function
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: scheme set list function |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Apr 2019 15:56:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Aaron Hill <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2019-04-08 4:35 am, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> There is no global variable x. There is a binding, but the scope of
>> the binding ends with the let. This binding is anonymous afterwards
>> and has no name. You can call functions manipulating the global
>> variable x from inside of foo and their action is not related to
>> having used the binding x when defining foo.
>
> I didn't say global, I said "global". The quotes are there
> intentionally as I know it is not an actual top-level binding, but it
> is effectively no different in practice.
If there were no difference in practice, there would not have been an
incentive for Emacs to acquire the lexical-binding variable/feature.
--
David Kastrup
Re: scheme set list function, Urs Liska, 2019/04/08
- Re: scheme set list function, Gianmaria Lari, 2019/04/08
- Re: scheme set list function, Thomas Morley, 2019/04/08
- Re: scheme set list function, Aaron Hill, 2019/04/08
- Re: scheme set list function, David Kastrup, 2019/04/08
- Re: scheme set list function, Aaron Hill, 2019/04/08
- Re: scheme set list function,
David Kastrup <=
Re: scheme set list function, Thomas Morley, 2019/04/08
Re: scheme set list function, Gianmaria Lari, 2019/04/09
Re: scheme set list function, David Kastrup, 2019/04/09
Re: scheme set list function, Gianmaria Lari, 2019/04/09
Re: scheme set list function, Carl Sorensen, 2019/04/08
Re: scheme set list function, Thomas Morley, 2019/04/08
Re: scheme set list function, Gianmaria Lari, 2019/04/08
Re: scheme set list function, Andrew Bernard, 2019/04/08