[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: missing Lout math signs
From: |
Jeffrey H Kingston |
Subject: |
Re: missing Lout math signs |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 1996 15:08:11 +0000 |
I have added a mapsto relation to @Eq for the next release.
There are no symbols for the sets N, Z, Q, R, and C in any
of the widely available fonts. The best approximation I can
suggest is to use bold, perhaps in definitions such as
extend @Eq
def @Natural { @B "N" }
to make it easy to use.
Lout's equation formatting has been gradually improving now
for a long time, and it has reached a point where further
improvement requires different fonts. Have you tried teq
(user's guide, end of equation formatting chapter)? I
consider teq to be comparable to TeX in quality, and I would
be interested to hear of any remaining problems with it.
Jeff Kingston