[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Little PDF hack
From: |
Michael Piotrowski |
Subject: |
Re: Little PDF hack |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Mar 1998 00:36:45 +0100 (MET) |
> > No, what I meant was the following: If I want hyperlinked cross
> > references, etc., I have to replace the original definitions of the
> > relevant statements (e.g., @Section) with new versions which output
> > the appropriate pdfmarks. My question is now, what is the best way
> > to do this?
>
> If you don't want to interfere with other users copy all of the
> relevant files somewhere and use -I option. This way you can select
> pdfmark or standard version with this one option. (Then the other day
> it might be integrated into standard version :).
Sorry, but I've got to ask again. With LaTeX (which I know better), if I want
to customize, say, the report document class, I make a new class file which
first loads the original class, inheriting everything from it. I then go on
redefining just those things I need to change.
But with Lout it seems to me that it's common practice to make a copy of the
entire original file and change it. That right?
Apropos of common practice: Has anybody already done some larger style
customization of a document type? Apart from the PDF thing I'd like to port my
LaTeX report style to Lout (see
http://www.linguistik.uni-erlangen.de/~mxp/Magister/ma_report_5.pdf for an
example). (Incidentally, it somehow happened to become the standard style at
our site, so, if I succeeded with the port, I could easily recommend everybody
here to use Lout.)
Greetings
--
Michael Piotrowski <address@hidden>
Department of Computational Linguistics --- University of Erlangen, Germany
You know, basically, I'm no good at either linguistics or computer science.
--Larry Wall