|
From: | Oliver Bandel |
Subject: | Re: Difference between ps and pdf |
Date: | Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:50:11 +0200 |
User-agent: | Horde Application Framework 5 |
Zitat von Matěj Cepl <address@hidden> (Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:32:09 +0200)
On 2016-04-06, 02:40 GMT, Valery Ushakov wrote:PDF backend is not really suitable for anything advanced. It's ok for text and tables, but graphics doesn't really work. Advanced graphics in Lout relies on PS interpreter to do computations to "finish" the layout. This obviously can't work with PDF.My question is whether Lout generated PostScript travels without problems to PDF via ps2pdf. Could one be certain that whatever tricks they make in PostScript will carry to PDF?
[...] ps2pdf relies on Ghostscript, which is a Postscript-interpreter. So, if Ghostscript renders Postscript correctly, chances are good, that the pdf will work too. Ciao, Oliver
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |