Re: LYNX-DEV Update code and patches "RFC" :)

[Scott McGee (Personal)]

I was just thinking about what Fote was saying regarding continued addition of
image bloating features to lynx. (I'm paraphrasing, don't bother to correct my
statement unless I am WAY off in left field [that means "way wrong" for those
not fluent with american cliches])

What struck me, is could someone (I assume someone means a person who is m
motivated by having a system with limited resources and therefore motivated)
look at lynx features with an eye to what can be left out to reduce image size

without overly reducing usefulness. That way, by coordinating with those more
knowledgeble with the code, compile switches can be set up to help produce 
such limited versions of Lynx.

What do you guys think? Is it worth investigating, or have I been up too
late on a very bad day anyway?

Scott

 GENEALOGY |  Do you know who your ancestors are?  | Scott McGee
 ----------+---------------------------------------+-------------------
 email: address@hidden                        | What? Me speak for
 web:   http://genealogy.org/~smcgee/homepage.html | someone else? Nah!
 --------------------------------------------------+-------------------
    See my genealogy page at  http://www.genealogy.org/~smcgee 
    and my GenWeb page at     http://www.slcc.edu/~genweb
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;