[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?
From: |
gregory j. rosmaita |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list? |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Nov 1996 12:45:16 -0500 (EST) |
aloha, larry!
On Thu, 7 Nov 1996, Larry W. Virden, x2487 wrote:
> What I mean is that in some manner, either at compile or run time, we
> should consider providing a way to make lynx as easy to use for the
> speech synthesisers as possible - if we are going to use this segment
> of the internet as a bargaining chip when harassing sites to make them
> lynx compatible.
as i've stated ad nauseam, it <strong>must</strong> be at run time as the
number of speech users who've compiled lynx is a neglible percentage of
all speech users using lynx...
speech synthesis support and multiple bookmarks <strong>should</strong>,
nay <strong>must</strong>, be built into lynx, otherwise a blind user
who starts an account at an ISP who's chosen <strong>NOT</strong> to
compile for speech because, at compile time, the sys admin decided it was
a remote eventuality and merely a wast of disk space, is up the proverbial
creek without a white cane...
look at it this way--from the user logs, it is obvious that not a lot of
sys admins bother to regularly upgrade lynx, so why would they bother to
compile for speech?
gregory.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory J. Rosmaita, CISter Master
http://www.njin.net/caldwell
address@hidden
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Audin Malmin, 1996/11/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Walter Skorski, 1996/11/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1996/11/06
- LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1996/11/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Al Gilman, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Benjamin C. W. Sittler, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?,
gregory j. rosmaita <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Al Gilman, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Benjamin C. W. Sittler, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Al Gilman, 1996/11/08
- LYNX-DEV trickle-down development?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Walter Skorski, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Walter Skorski, 1996/11/06