Re: LYNX-DEV suggestion for post lynx 2.7 development

[Duncan Hill]

On Tue, 28 Jan 1997, Larry W. Virden, x2487 wrote:

> to become increasingly difficult to determine how to respond.  Previously
> users were confused about what to do when lynx mentioned the fact that
> bad html was encountered.  However, it was a warning only.  Now users
> are forced to respond to prompts, without an option to explain to
> them what the ramifications with their choice.  If they refuse a cookie,

Hmm..I know we're limited more or less to 75 - 80 characters (normally)
but perhaps add the ? as a choice..ie, user selects a link, message pops
up D)ownload, C)ancel or ?/H)elp..but again, what adds to the string
lenght, and I don't know how easy it would be to add..(I'm having enough
trouble trying to find how .mailcap is defined :> so that I can change it
on my copy of the DJGPP port.)

Duncan Hill
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Student of the Barbados Community College
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - I think that I think therefore I think I am.
http://www.sunbeach.net/personal/dhill/dhill.htm 
http://www.sunbeach.net/personal/dhill/lynx/lynx-main.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;