Re: LYNX-DEV Looking ahead. WAS [ One post, many things. ]

[Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim)]

On Sun, 2 Feb 1997, Subir Grewal wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Feb 1997, Foteos Macrides wrote:
> :     I don't want to leave you high and dry, Subir, but we can't
> :stick our head in the sand about what has happened this week.  My
> :simple offer to "officialize" the FM code set as a v2.7 so that ...
> Fote,
> I think I understand some of the issues, but most of the ones I see seem
> quite minor to me.  Most of the immediate friction seems to center around
> the Lynx documentation, to be frank I have absolutely no problem with...

It's a code freeze.  SHIP IT (Fote's 1/29 .zip) as Lynx2-7!  When
the docs are "better", ship that as Lynx2-7-1.  I'd like to see the
current snapshot get onto the GNU CDROM, myself.

> PS everyone.  If I'm making it too easy for him to leave, please people
> let me know ;~) 

This is Fote's baby, and to stretch the analogy, he can't trust us as
babysitters.  But we should try to act like responsible care providers.
------
<http://www.cs.indiana.edu/picons/db/users/us/md/lib/bcpl/jspath/face.xbm>

;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;