Re: LYNX-DEV Some things I'd like in the next Lynx package.

[Wayne Buttles]

On Tue, 11 Mar 1997, Brian Tillman, x8425 wrote:

> Wayne Buttles (address@hidden) writes:
> 
> >How about a 6 month update nag in Lynx itself with a -no_nag switch.
> 
> Lord, no!  There are often valid reasons why updating impractical, even if 
> the 
> sysadmin is perfectly willing.  A nag would make Lynx _way_ too much like PC 
> junkware.

PC junkware nags because you didn't pay for it.  This is just a gentle
reminder that the copy you are using is getting on in age.  And it could
be tied to the date of the binary so a simple touch could disable it for
another 6 months.

Wayne

;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;