Re: LYNX-DEV Some things I'd like in the next Lynx package.

[vorac]

on Tue, 11 Mar 1997 "Brian Tillman, x8425" <address@hidden>
>
>Wayne Buttles (address@hidden) writes:
>
>>How about a 6 month update nag in Lynx itself with a -no_nag switch.
>
>Lord, no!  There are often valid reasons why updating impractical, even if the 
>sysadmin is perfectly willing.  A nag would make Lynx _way_ too much like PC 
>junkware.

I agree.  Related suggestion:  maybe changing the way fatal errors are
handled based on the date is a good idea?
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;