[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source
From: |
Larry W. Virden, x2487 |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source |
Date: |
Sat, 10 May 1997 07:15:16 -0400 |
>> +/*static const char letters[] */
>> +/* Why does gcc complain if I leave the const in? */
>check the c-preprocessor expansion, it'll probably show the problem.
>
>> + static char letters[]
>> = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789";
Well, when I check the c-preprocessor expansion, I see:
static const char letters[]
= "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789";
I still don't see a reason to call this an embedded function.
--
Larry W. Virden INET: address@hidden
<URL:http://www.teraform.com/%7Elvirden/> <*> O- "We are all Kosh."
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Scott McGee (Personal), 1997/05/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Scott McGee (Personal), 1997/05/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Scott McGee (Personal), 1997/05/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Jonathan Sergent, 1997/05/09
- LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx - code, Klaus Weide, 1997/05/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx - code, Jonathan Sergent, 1997/05/10
- LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1997/05/10
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source, T.E.Dickey, 1997/05/10
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source,
Larry W. Virden, x2487 <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source, Jonathan Sergent, 1997/05/10
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1997/05/10
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/05/09