LYNX-DEV "Makefile" shouldn't exist (was: Re: Lynx on BSDI)

[Klaus Weide]

On Thu, 28 Aug 1997, [KOI8-R] áÎÄÒÅÊ þÅÒÎÏ× wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Aug 1997, T.E.Dickey wrote:
> 
> > > Looks like a Lynx with STYLES problem. In the Makefile, you have to
> > > explicitly comment out the "styling" options for the compile to go 
> > > through.
> > > I had the same problem with compiling on HP-UX, but removed the syling
> > > options in Makefile for the compile to go through.
> > nope.  If you are using the makefile that the configure script generates,
> > this is not an issue.  (Only if you are using the obsolete Makefile.old).
> 
> I wonder why Makefile still exists in Lynx-ac distribution...

It doesn't exist, it has been renamed from "Makefile" to "Makefile.old".
Except that I just found that a "Makefile" is still being packaged in
the lynx2.7.1ac-*.{tar.gz,tar.Z,zip} files, now in addition to
"Makefile.old".   That is unintentional, a mistake, because there was
still an old copy of "Makefile" (which is now older than "Makefile.old" :)
lying around in the directory from which the packages are built.
The script doesn't automatically deal with the situation of removing
or renaming files, it seems.  I'll remove the copy manually now.
Jim, could you change the debit script to take care of this?

No wonder there was confusion...

  Klaus

;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;