lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 2.7.1ac-0.74 and LYUnEscapeEntities problem under digi


From: Heikki Kantola
Subject: Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 2.7.1ac-0.74 and LYUnEscapeEntities problem under digital UNIX
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 22:40:50 +0300

According to T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>:
> > According to T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>:
> > > If it builds with -std1, although with more warnings, I would like to see
> > 
> > No, no, just vice versa, _without_ "-std1" there's plenty of warnings 
> > even as the resulting binary works quite ok. With "-std1" then you get
> > just one warning I quoted in my earlier message. 
> > 
> > > the logs (to see if there are any easy ones to fix).  However, Lynx's use
> > > of const is likely to be a problem.  If so, I'd leave it at the default
> > > compiler flags until someone has the patience to clean it up.
>
> well, then unless there's some problem, I'd leave it at that, since I'd
> add options only to get it to build/work properly.

Ok, as you wish, I just find following bit annoying when it comes in
great quantities:
cc: Warning: /usr/include/stdarg.h, line 42: The redefinition of the
macro "va_start" conflicts with a current definition because the
number of parameters is different.  The redefinition is now in effect.
#define va_start(list, parmN) __builtin_va_start(list, parmN, 1)
-----------------------^

Also when testing without my very much optimizing default CFLAGS env 
variable I also got another warning "File not optimized; use -g3 if 
both optimization and debug wanted." for each file due configure's
default behiviour. I wonder if something could be done for that...

-- 
Heikki "Hezu" Kantola, <address@hidden>
Lähettämällä mainoksia tai muuta asiatonta sähköpostia yllä olevaan
osoitteeseen sitoudut maksamaan oikolukupalvelusta FIM500 alkavalta
tunnilta.
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]