Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx

[Andrew Kuchling]

Doug Kaufman <address@hidden> wrote:
>now works better than it ever has. In general, memory is not a problem.
>DJGPP creates protected mode programs that run using a DPMI manager.  I
>think that the main DOS lynx problem now is the lack of a functioning

        Ah... I was thinking of the problems of writing code that
would work on 286-class machines.  DPMI programs require a 386 or
higher processor, right?  So if we're already restricting the port to
386 or higher, then maintaining a DOS port isn't that much of a
problem; you'd have lots of memory, 32-bit code, etc.


        Andrew Kuchling
        address@hidden
        http://starship.skyport.net/crew/amk/