[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV: "user Agent: mozilla 3.0 compatible" no-workee
From: |
David Combs |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV: "user Agent: mozilla 3.0 compatible" no-workee |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Jan 1998 18:38:05 -0800 (PST) |
In these situations, is it ALWAYS the RIGHT frame we want
to try first?
And, just what IS this RIGHT, LEFT, etc stuff?
Thanks!
> From address@hidden Sun Jan 18 06:55:22 1998
> From: address@hidden (Philip Webb)
>
> 980117 Doug Kaufman wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 Jan 1998, David Combs wrote:
> > > Am trying to fake out a site by telling it I have mozilla 3.0 compatible
> > > http://www.classicalinsites.com/wqxr/music/schedule/index.html
> > > Charset: iso-8859-1 (assumed)
> > > Server: Apache/1.2-dev
> > > keeps saying I have to download netscrape or exploiter.
> > This doesn't have anything to do with faking Mozilla.
> > This is a frames site. Lynx can handle frames,
> > but the message that it can't is put up by the server.
> > Just click on the frames buttons with lynx and you will be able
> > to negotiate to the schedule. On this site, try the RIGHT frame first.
> > I just got the schedule with lynx.
>
> New Scientist www.newscientist.com/ has a page like this:
> for some reason they introduce their page of news items with a frame,
> but you simply goto the relevant frame.
> i've told them, but their site manager is overworked or underbrained.
>
> doesn't this deserve a note somewhere in the Help files?
Ditto on need for note in the Help files or FAQ.
> or might it become a FAQ?
Re: LYNX-DEV: "user Agent: mozilla 3.0 compatible" no-workee,
David Combs <=
Re: LYNX-DEV: "user Agent: mozilla 3.0 compatible" no-workee, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/01/21