Re: LYNX-DEV Re: todo-list question

[T.E.Dickey]

> 
> From: "T.E.Dickey" <address@hidden>
> >> 2) sending trace output to a file
> >That's "done" in the sense that you can redirect stderr.  But there's 
> >problems
> >with the redirection mechanism.
> 
> I guess I don't understand - when I say lynx -trace, the output all
> goes to a trace file.  This occurs in both variations of Unix based
internally it's done by reassigning stderr.  the particular construct
won't work well for systems where the FILE data aren't neatly in an
array (there was some discussion about this a month ago).

> lynx that I use.  Is this not available in other variations?  And what
> is the lynx community coming to that we are going to have to somehow
> document that particular features are present or not in various distributions
> of the application.  Sigh.
> -- 
> Larry W. Virden                 INET: address@hidden
> <URL:http://www.teraform.com/%7Elvirden/> <*> O- "We are all Kosh."
> Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should 
> be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
> 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey