[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV lynx_386 minor correction to comments
From: |
Leonid Pauzner |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV lynx_386 minor correction to comments |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 1998 21:41:48 +0300 (MSK) |
> * To: address@hidden
> * Subject: Re: LYNX-DEV lynx_386 minor correction to comments
> * From: Doug Kaufman <address@hidden>
> * Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 17:43:15 -0800 (PST)
> * In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
> * Reply-To: address@hidden
> * Sender: address@hidden
> _________________________________________________________________
>
> On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, T.E.Dickey wrote:
>
> > > I thought that on windows it was copy, and not cp?
> > DK's zip file has some unix-style utilities (perhaps cp.exe is included).
>
> I believe that Wayne, Bill Schiavo, and I have each included cp.exe in
> the binary distribution. I believe that Wayne included the UXUTL
> version, and I included the GNU version. I am not sure which version
> Bill has in his distribution. I suspect that one could simply define cp
> as copy/b in userdefs.h, but I have never tried it. Since copy is a DOS
Also, I compile ac-0.108 with copy /b in userdefs.h - it DOESN'T WORK
for MS-DOS 6.22 ("too many parameters" message while downloading),
but without "/b" we will get binary corrupted.
So the item is closed?
As far as NDOS or DRDOS they should work here exactly as MSDOS do
following the same command.com's instructions.
Leonid.
> internal command, I am not sure how this would work for those using
> alternate command processing systems, such as NDOS or DRDOS. (Last
> comment modified from private comments by Wayne Buttles.)
> Doug