[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV when relative URLs should ignore BASE
From: |
Al Gilman |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV when relative URLs should ignore BASE |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Feb 1998 16:51:46 -0500 (EST) |
to follow up on what Foteos Macrides said:
> The fragments for the text/html "media type" presently have two possible
> "interpretations". One is "Go find the MAP for this client-side image
> map to interpret how clicks in various positions of the image should
> be handled." (Lynx can't inline images, and has its own, different but
> homologous interpretation. :) The other is for positioning within the
> document.
The action taken on HREF and on USEMAP is different but the
interpretation of the fragment in #fragment is one and the same.
It is a reference into the namespace of anchor.name's and
other.id's created in the enclosing HTML [etc.] document.
It is one and the same name/reference scheme used both for
navigation and map linkage. But for USEMAP, you don't have to
check that the target is a MAP, its ( NAME | ID ) is known to be
unique among all identified elements.
Al