[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems
From: |
Eric Anderson |
Subject: |
RE: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Feb 1998 15:11:16 -0500 |
If it's something that would give greater flexibility in controlling
keys in lynx then it would be well received, I should think. With the
variety of unix terminals in use, something needs be done to make
keymapping easier.
ANything that can make lynx interpret ^[[154q as PGUP (and the rest of
the funky codes) would be most welcome, by me at least!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [SMTP:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 1998 1:41 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems
>
>
> Unfortunately, it appears that the current mechanism in lynx is to
> make
> single byte codes to special functions. I see no way to specify
> terminfo
> variable names in the KEY_MAP variables of the lynx.cfg file.
>
> Is this something that would be useful? It seems like, with that
> facility,
> then the request about specialized function key mapping would be less
> painful.
> --
> Larry W. Virden INET: address@hidden
> <URL:http://www.teraform.com/%7Elvirden/> <*> O- "We are all Kosh."
> Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting
> should
> be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
- LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, Eric Anderson, 1998/02/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, John E. Davis, 1998/02/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, John E. Davis, 1998/02/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, John E. Davis, 1998/02/26
- RE: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems,
Eric Anderson <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, John E. Davis, 1998/02/26
- RE: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/02/27