[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version
From: |
Doug Kaufman |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Mar 1998 17:34:56 -0800 (PST) |
On Sun, 1 Mar 1998, T.E.Dickey wrote:
> > And of course, defining DOSPATH is out since DOSPATH implies a bunch
> > of unrelated things like that you want your terminal type to be
> > hardcoded as "vt100"!
Is there a reason that vt100 is hardcoded into the DOSPATH versions?
There is a thread on comp.editors now complaining that the vt100 causes
problems with vim, when it is used as the editor from lynx_386. There
are simple workarounds, but I never understood why a TERM variable
should be hardcoded in (and not overridden by a TERM environment
variable).
Doug
__
Doug Kaufman
Internet: address@hidden (preferred)
address@hidden
- LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Wayne Buttles, 1998/02/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Benjamin C. W. Sittler, 1998/02/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Jason F. McBrayer, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version,
Doug Kaufman <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Wayne Buttles, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/02
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Doug Kaufman, 1998/03/02
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Jason F. McBrayer, 1998/03/01