Re: LYNX-DEV Bug in lynx 118

[T.E.Dickey]

> Re: deleting .h
> 
> Nope - I didn't understand that I had to do that - I misunderstood the msg
> to say that the _patch_ would be deleting it...
sorry - I know that I've seen some patches (e.g., from XFree86 do this),
but normally I do not use that option (the 'makepatch' script does not
generate empty files, which could be exploited by 'patch -E', but instead
it generates a short script at the front of the patch -- but that's not
apparent when you read one of my patches, since that is obscured by the
'diffstat' listing.

(I read all patches first, to see what should be done).

> Larry W. Virden                 INET: address@hidden
> <URL:http://www.teraform.com/%7Elvirden/> <*> O- "We are all Kosh."
> Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should 
> be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
> 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey