[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8)
|
From: |
David Woolley |
|
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8) |
|
Date: |
Tue, 10 Mar 1998 23:40:47 +0000 (GMT) |
>
> Who prosecutes cases of munitions export? Is there actually a human I can
> ask if distributing lynx w/ssl is ok?
I think it is the FBI that prosecutes (check the details of the PGP
prosecution), but it is the Department of Trade that issues the licenses,
not just for munitions.
>
- Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/03/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/09
- LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Philip Webb, 1998/03/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Wayne Buttles, 1998/03/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Mark H. Wood, 1998/03/10
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1998/03/10
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Matt Ackeret, 1998/03/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), David Woolley, 1998/03/11
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (hooks are munitions?), Al Gilman, 1998/03/10
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8),
David Woolley <=
Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, Personal, 1998/03/09
Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/11