[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?
From: |
Wayne Buttles |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined? |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Mar 1998 14:56:58 -0500 (EST) |
On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Hynek Med wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Wayne Buttles wrote:
>
> > I have been wanting to look at that, but wanted to finally get a real
> > version out (2.8 is the first real WIN/DOS ver, right?) without breaking
> > anything. Now that we finally made it, I have some stuff I'd like to see
> > get done.
>
> Forgive me if I'm wrong, I haven't been watching lynx-dev closely in
> recent time, but I'm afraid FTP doesn't still work in DOS version..
> Perhaps it should be #ifdefied (some kind of "this version doesn't
> support ftp:// URLs") until it works..
I had not planned on ifdefing it out. If someone else knows how to easily
do it then that is fine with me. I had hoped we would figure it out by
now. I even spent a couple days last week tracing it down again and I
still don't get it.
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?, Wayne Buttles, 1998/03/15
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?, Doug Kaufman, 1998/03/15
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?, Doug Kaufman, 1998/03/15
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/15
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?, afn06760, 1998/03/16
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/17
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?, afn06760, 1998/03/17
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/17
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/17