[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1dev.9
|
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
|
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1dev.9 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 4 May 1998 05:27:29 -0400 (EDT) |
> 980503 Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > (the only new bug that I know of)
> >
> > 1998-05-03 (2.8.1dev.9)
> > * correct missing counter increment in tempname(), from cleanup. - TD
>
> i now notice you say "new" bug, so maybe you haven't forgotten,
> but there's still the bug in the effect of n ,
> which fails to find & place the next string occurrence accurately:
> see your reply to me 980329 1306 "will check".
yes - being reminded, I looked at it for a while this weekend with no
immediate solution. It is entangled in some logic that Klaus and Fote
did differently - so I have to find where the change should be made.
(But now at least I have the problem in my head, so I'll be looking for
the fix).
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey