lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev build of lynx2.8.1dev.10 failed on Solaris 2.6


From: T.E.Dickey
Subject: Re: lynx-dev build of lynx2.8.1dev.10 failed on Solaris 2.6
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 05:28:08 -0400 (EDT)

> 
> Will there also be problems with LYMain.c line 3269 which reads: 
>       "tagsoup",        FUNCTION_ARG,           tagsoup_fun, 
> ?                                              ^ 
>  
no: there are several cases; the one you cites yesterday is the address
of a pointer, and in the macros is (type)cast to a 'long'.  But the
ones on lines marked 'FUNCTION_ARG' are function-names, which are
implicitly addresses.

I checked the types (because John's original patch dumped core), by
constructing some debug-ifdef's which would flush out the mismatches.
But gcc silently supplied the missing '&' in that case (which is a
little surprising, since I thought it covered that case -- but occasionally
it misses something).

> __Henry 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]