Re: lynx-dev lynx.cfg

[T.E.Dickey]

> Since we're now using configure (last time I played with Lynx, Fote was 
> still in charge, and he seemed against it at the time), shouldn't we follow 
> the guidelines that go along with it? 
>  
> To that end, wouldn't lynx.cfg be considered an architecture independent 
> data file, and therefore end up in ${prefix}/share rather than lib? 
I had left it in ${prefix}/lib since that would have been an (imho) unnecessary
change.  But it's simple to change (if there's enough acceptance).
  
> Actually, I would prefer share/lynx, but I'm not sure how that fits into 
> the Grand Scheme Of Things (tm). 
for one file only - probably not a lot (except that the help-files also
are platform-independent).
  
> But at the least, it, and all the help files and what not should be moved 
> out of lib and into share. 
>  
> mrc 
> --  
>        Mike Castle       Life is like a clock:  You can work constantly 
>   address@hidden  and be right all the time, or not work at all 
> www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day.  -- mrc 
>     We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan.  -- Watchmen 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey