[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default
From: |
Eric |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Aug 1998 22:49:43 -0400 (EDT) |
Well, for one thing... I used to have --enable-nsl-fork on my machine, but
with 8MB RAM, it's just horrifically inefficient because when it fork()'s, it
copies over another 2MB of memory... and that thrashes my system to hell with
swapping. I could live with --disable-nsl-fork though...
On Sat, 22 Aug 1998, Philip Webb wrote:
> given that we have to rely on a configure switch --enable-nsl-fork
> to stop a look-up with `z', why is the default disable?
> shouldn't it be enable?
>
>
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), dickey, 1998/08/21
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), Leonid Pauzner, 1998/08/21
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), Philip Webb, 1998/08/21
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), brian j. pardy, 1998/08/21
- lynx-dev nsl-fork documentation (patch), Philip Webb, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Philip Webb, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Jason F. McBrayer, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default,
Eric <=
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Doug Kaufman, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Philip Webb, 1998/08/23
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Al Gilman, 1998/08/23
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, pg, 1998/08/23
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), Philip Webb, 1998/08/21