[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default
From: |
Al Gilman |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Aug 1998 14:19:31 -0400 (EDT) |
to follow up on what Doug Kaufman said:
> On Sat, 22 Aug 1998, Philip Webb wrote:
>
> > given that we have to rely on a configure switch --enable-nsl-fork
> > to stop a look-up with `z', why is the default disable?
> > shouldn't it be enable?
>
> Not all operating systems allow this. MSDOS, for example, doesn't allow
> forking. No one has yet written alternative code for lynx that allows
> these actions in MSDOS.
I think that this can be handled in the Configure script.
If the default for the --enable-nsl-fork switch is "enable" that
doesn't have to mean it gets compiled into the DOS target if
there is no such fork capability in DOS. I would hope it means
that if you don't say --disable... and you are targeting a
platform which supports the nsl-fork functionality, that it will
be compiled in.
Is that correct?
Al
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), dickey, 1998/08/21
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), Leonid Pauzner, 1998/08/21
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), Philip Webb, 1998/08/21
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), brian j. pardy, 1998/08/21
- lynx-dev nsl-fork documentation (patch), Philip Webb, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Philip Webb, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Jason F. McBrayer, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Eric, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Doug Kaufman, 1998/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, Philip Webb, 1998/08/23
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default,
Al Gilman <=
- Re: lynx-dev nsl-fork default, pg, 1998/08/23
- Re: lynx-dev z (was Re: Timeout parameter?), Philip Webb, 1998/08/21