Re: lynx-dev internal links

[dickey]

> 
> 980903 Thomas Dickey wrote:  
> > talking about experimental, let's go back to the issue 
> > of Klaus' "internal links".  I left them in 2.8 with the understanding 
> > that consensus is that we'd remove them for the next release. 
> > Is that correct?  (Removing them is simpler than adding them ;-). 
>   
> you're going to have to remind people what this issue is about ... 
hmm.

(If Fote were still connected, he'd send out a dissertation on the topic).

The gist is that Lynx can be configured to recognize links within a
document that don't behave the way Fote interpreted someone's draft
proposal.  (He's more than likely correct, but spent a lot of words without
pinpointing the exact issue - ading words to an argument doesn't make it
cleared).  It's in the code now, but not normally activated.

> SUPPORT     ___________//___,  Philip Webb : address@hidden 

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey