[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1pre.8
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1pre.8 |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Oct 1998 05:28:51 -0400 (EDT) |
>
> Philip Webb wrote:
>
> > AND FINALLY: haven't we added enough new features & tested things enough
> > to call the product *** Lynx 2-9 *** (or 2.9, if you prefer) ?
>
> We certainly haven't added anything big enough to go to 3.0. If we go
that's my perspective too. We've added a lot of small changes, but nothing
big - nor anything that makes the current version incompatible with 2.7.2
or 2.8
> to 2.9, there's very little breathing room left before 3.0. So, best to
> be conservative with version numbers until something really big does
> get added -- e.g. XML, or horizontal scrolling and real table support,
> or java/javascript support, that sort of thing.
>
> >Bela<
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- lynx-dev lynx2.8.1pre.8, dickey, 1998/10/04
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1pre.8, Bela Lubkin, 1998/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1pre.8, Bela Lubkin, 1998/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1pre.8,
dickey <=
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1pre.8, dickey, 1998/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1pre.8, Leonid Pauzner, 1998/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1pre.8 : patch, Philip Webb, 1998/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1pre.8, David Combs, 1998/10/13