Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.1pre.8

[dickey]

> 
> Tom Dickey wrote: 
>  
> >     + Bela is investigating a problem which may be due to NSL_FORK 
>  
> To be precise, Bela is waiting for David Combs to reply with system call 
> and Lynx trace info.  I've done nothing more than the previous message 
> to the list, and the research that went into it (basically, looking at 
> the code and imagining how we could get out of the fork loop without 
> having properly waited for the child). 

thanks - I've read through the code a couple of times, and (of course)
don't see the problem either.  My live connection to the net at work is
via a SunOS box, so I can test it if I know what to look for. (But iirc,
I've been using random snapshots of Lynx w/o problem).

>  
> >Bela< 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey