Re: lynx-dev anonymous usage of Lynx (was Arizona)

[Philip Webb]

981009 Ian White wrote: 
> What about places where Lynx (with restrictions) is a shell
> for users (with their own seperate accounts).

either such users are equivalent to anonymous users
-- you don't trust them loose in a normal system --
or you can give them normal unrestricted shell access.

> Should freenet systems start looking now
> for something else that meets their needs?
 
i suspect a lot of `freenets' are taking a free ride
on the volunteer efforts of Lynx developers:
i'ld like to hear from a current/recent Lynx developer
who also runs an anonymous/restricted (as above) system.
if freenet/library managers don't contribute to the development effort,
the real-life answer to your question is obviously `Yes'.

-- 
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT     ___________//___,  Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT    `-O----------O---'  University of Toronto