[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev anonymous usage of Lynx (was Arizona)
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev anonymous usage of Lynx (was Arizona) |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Oct 1998 17:38:15 -0400 (EDT) |
981009 Ian White wrote:
> What about places where Lynx (with restrictions) is a shell
> for users (with their own seperate accounts).
either such users are equivalent to anonymous users
-- you don't trust them loose in a normal system --
or you can give them normal unrestricted shell access.
> Should freenet systems start looking now
> for something else that meets their needs?
i suspect a lot of `freenets' are taking a free ride
on the volunteer efforts of Lynx developers:
i'ld like to hear from a current/recent Lynx developer
who also runs an anonymous/restricted (as above) system.
if freenet/library managers don't contribute to the development effort,
the real-life answer to your question is obviously `Yes'.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
- Re: lynx-dev Re: who owns what -anonymous, Greg Barniskis, 1998/10/08
- Re: lynx-dev anonymous usage of Lynx (was Arizona), brian j. pardy, 1998/10/09
- Re: lynx-dev anonymous usage of Lynx (was Arizona), Philip Webb, 1998/10/10
- Re: lynx-dev anonymous usage of Lynx (was Arizona), brian j. pardy, 1998/10/10
- Re: lynx-dev anonymous usage of Lynx (was Arizona), Rob Partington, 1998/10/28