lynx-dev Proposed patch (Dos related) -new patch

[kifox]

>
>     _________________________________________________________________
>   
>   [Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
>   
>            Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related) - new patch!
>     _________________________________________________________________
>   
>     * To: address@hidden
>     * Subject: Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related) - new patch!
>     * From: "Leonid Pauzner" <address@hidden>
>     * Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 16:31:02 +0400 (MSD)
>     * References: <address@hidden>
>     * Reply-To: address@hidden
>     * Sender: address@hidden
>     _________________________________________________________________
>   
>diff -u old/lyreadcf.c ./lyreadcf.c
>--- old/lyreadcf.c      Thu Oct  1 10:49:22 1998
>+++ ./lyreadcf.c        Sat Oct 10 16:28:40 1998
>@@ -1237,9 +1237,14 @@
>
>        LYforce_no_cache = TRUE;  /* don't cache this doc */
>
>-#if defined(HAVE_CONFIG_H) || defined(VMS)
>+#if defined(HAVE_CONFIG_H) || defined(VMS) || defined(UNIX)
>        StrAllocCopy(temp, LYNX_CFG_FILE);
> #else
>+       /* lynx_cfg_file may seems to be another successful candidate     */
>+       /* but it may happend without comments since we allow INCLUDE !!! */
>+       /* We want to be sure the file holds all the comments in and      */
>+       /* somehow close to distribution's lynx.cfg. Any suggestions?     */
>+
>        StrAllocCopy(temp, helpfilepath); /* FIXME: no absolute path */
>        StrAllocCat(temp, LYNXCFG_HELP);  /* for lynx.cfg on DOS/Win32 */
> #endif /* HAVE_CONFIG_H */

I think this patch should be modified to include Linux in addition to
DOS/WIN32 for pretty much the same reasons.
DOS/WIN32 for pretty much the same reasons.