Re: lynx-dev status

[Benjamin C. W. Sittler]

On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, Larry W. Virden wrote:

> The following are NOT intended to be critical of PW's work but instead
> a hope that a more accurate reference document could be provided.
> 
> 
> Does anyone have a better quick html reference than the one at ukans.edu ?
> It's rather old (I think 2+ yrs old) and doesn't cover much of contemporary
> html.
> 
> It also might be useful to review whethere a more contemporary Primer doc
> is available - the ntsa one again is rather old and something else might more
> accurately reflect current HTML usage.

While it isn't structured like a typical primer, I find the HTML standards
documents at W3C to be quite useful when writing HTML, as they cover most
contemporary HTML (and since they're standards, the HTML they cover is
likely to still work several years from now.)