[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev strange interaction with gettext/anonymous/gz
From: |
Nelson Henry Eric |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev strange interaction with gettext/anonymous/gz |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Nov 1998 21:50:36 +0900 (JST) |
> Well, I haven't even looked at the dev.n code yet; but since there aren't
> many alternatives AFAIK, and gettext seems to be the GNU way, in principle
> I'm all for it. I just prefer to look at other things now, and leave the
Echos my sentiments.
> If the problem was only that it was too restrictive with respect to length,
> that could be easily changed by bumping up that number, but I somehow
> doubt that that was the only problem.
I tried moving the number to twice what you had, but it still wasn't
enough to catch all the problem SUBJECTS. In truth, the only way I
could get it to work was to block all your checks on the strings and
force the whole thing to a "valid" (or was that invalid?) string.
It seemed to me that what was happening was that the string was getting
truncated somewhere, with the result that occasionally a multibyte
character would get split in a place that would result in a non-ascii
character that messed up what came after it. At the time, I thought
it was because the function seemed to analyze the =?iso-nnnn part only
one time, whereas in fact it can occur multiple times. It also seemed
like it was trying to cut out the =?iso-nnnn part, when it could just
stay there. But really my memory has faded a lot.
> Are you asking for the other HTmmdecode() because it also treated
> non-Japanese strings, or for some other reason?
Just thought it was a very noble idea for Lynx to try to handle
any language, not just CJK. I'm sure you've got your own priorities,
so fiddle with it only if you want. I just wanted to let you know
that I would continue to check that it was working or not with CJK.
(My level of understanding has not increased from a year ago, so
take that tongue-in-cheek.)
> How does the current Lynx show that Subject line?
Fine (Lynx also did the posting):
fj.test, Articles 105995-106024
([1]Earlier articles...)
Articles in fj.test
* [3]"$B%F%9%H$G$9!#(J" - OwlTKHS
* [4]"$B;n83Cf(J" - OwlTKHS
* [5]"Re: test test" - "LOVE CAT"
[...]
ignore @@NCM" - Usenet exProwler
* [12]"$B%F%9%H$G$"$j$^$9$k(J" - "skintone" <== this one's funny -HN
* [13]"none" - Anonymous
[...]
* [29]"EFNET NoCeM Report ncmreport.fj+japan+tnn-sbi.19981117-0415.1
ignore @@NCM" - Usenet exProwler
* [30]"$B<+%5!<%P7PM3$GB>address@hidden<%k<u?.(J" - <== this is it
address@hidden
_________________________________________________________________
__Henry
- lynx-dev strange interaction with gettext/anonymous/gz, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/11/16
- Re: lynx-dev strange interaction with gettext/anonymous/gz, dickey, 1998/11/16
- Re: lynx-dev strange interaction with gettext/anonymous/gz, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/11/16
- Re: lynx-dev strange interaction with gettext/anonymous/gz, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/11/17
- Re: lynx-dev strange interaction with gettext/anonymous/gz, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/11/17
- Re: lynx-dev strange interaction with gettext/anonymous/gz,
Nelson Henry Eric <=
- Re: lynx-dev strange interaction with gettext/anonymous/gz, dickey, 1998/11/18